![]() On an average "event" shoot, maybe 80% of the images need no special Photoshop editing. ![]() It can process an entire folder of images with mixed formats. That's another advantge of the Image Processor. I process the entire folder with the Image Processor, creating Jpegs in a new folder for uploading to Smugmug. Now my main folder has a mix of DNG and TIF files. When I do that, I then move the original DNG to a different directory folder. After making the ACR adjustments on the DNG files I go back and edit a few in Photoshop, saving a TIF version to the same directory. At that point you would have 4 copies of each image - the original RAW, the DNG, the TIF/PSD and the Jpeg. Then convert the TIF/PSD files to Jpeg (for web posting) using the Image Processor again. Then edit selected TIF/PSD files in Photoshop CS2. Then, with CS2, you can follow the procedure I gave in previous post.Īs an alternative, you can do all your ACR adjustments on the RAW/DNG fles and then convert them to TIF or PSD using the Image Processor. It's just a litle bit slower than simply copying RAW files from flash card to hard drive. Some people don't like the concept of DNG, but I like it for its convenience and use it to transfer the RAW files from the compact flash card to the hard drive, renaming them in the process. You can use CS2 with your current RAW files IF you first convert them with the free DNG converter available here: Then apply that ACR setting to all shots with the same red clothes and re-process. I'll go back to Bridge/ACR, pick one and lower the RED saturation/luminance till I like it. If, after you convert all, you find some that are not right (wrong white balance, bad exposure), it's easy to go back and change the ACR settings on just those images and re-process just those images with the Image Processor.įor example, in spite of all my calibration (camera, ACR profile, monitor, printer) I still find some pesky red clothes in a batch of event shots. Remember that all ACR settings are non-destructive. The Image Processor will take a long time to process 600 images, but it's the best and fastest way to batch process RAW files. So if you really want to use Noiseware and have the plugin, not the standalone, you can create an action to invoke Noiseware and invoke the action in the Image Processor. Brown enhanced version of the Image Processor, you can even run actions. Here you can resize, convert to sRGB, output as jpeg or any other format. Fire up the Image Processor which will process the whole batch. You can even make non-destructive crop settings in ACR. Farily easy to isolate batches of images that need different settings. Work on one image to find the "formulas" for white balance, noise, sharpening, exposure, etc. I shoot a lot of events and find Photoshop CS (2,3 or 4) plus Bridge plus the Image Processor script does it all very well. Play around with the ACR noise reduction and sharpening and compare the results to Noiseware on small image displays. And it adds significant time and trouble to your workflow. The Noiseware advantage will only be apparent in larger images. The Luminance noise reduction in ACR does a good enough job. If the answer is only web display or max 5x7 prints, then I'd suggest Noiseware (or NoiseNinja or any other third party noise reduction software) is overkill. Thanks.įirst Question: What is your intended final presentation of the images? Will they only be displayed on the Web, say on Smugmug up to their "X3" size? Or will they be printed at something bigger than 5x7? I'd like to set up a good workflow and buy only the software that will help me the most. should I use Noiseware to save as jpg during the batch processing?Īny and all suggestions are appreciated. convert to Tiff for noiseware batch or will nef work from within CS4 batch noiseware process (what is best program to batch convert raw - tiff for 600 shots at a time)ģ. I thinking about getting NX 2 after seeing Moose Peterson's tutorials.Ģ. I currently use CS 2 but am planning to upgrade to CS 4. If so, should I shoot RAW and convert to Tiff then batch process in Noiseware (I have both the stand alone and the plug in) and save as JPG for posting to Smugmug or what? I use to only shoot my daughter in RAW since I don't have time to edit every shot. I think that I should switch to RAW for the best results from the noise reduction. As such, I end up with a lot of images to process after the competition. I do this primarily for pics of my daughter but also shoot her entire team. I shoot a lot of gymnastics with my D700 and just got Noiseware to help clean up the images.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |